www.armstrongeconomics.com
QUESTION:
I am a great admirer of your Socrates model, but there’s one thing in
your personal pronouncements that seem to contain a contradiction. On
the one hand you are predicting a decline of the U.S.A. and other
western economies, mainly caused by excessive government interference in
the economy. However, on the other hand you are predicting a rise in
the prominence of China occurring simultaneously with the decline in the
Western economies, yet the Chinese economy is still dominated by
State-owned enterprises (SOEs) and that is unlikely to change anytime
soon. Can you please explain this apparent contradiction?
Also, you (perhaps justifiably) continually put the boot into Western
governments for their excessive involvement in their economies and yet
you rarely, if ever, criticise the Chinese government’s heavy
involvement in the Chinese economy. Why the double standard? Is Socrates
is actually predicting a near-term decline in Chinese government
involvement in their economy? And is there an allied Socrates prediction
for increased democracy in China in the near-term?
Thanks for your great service,
Andrew.
ANSWER:
You
are missing the timing and overlap. It is true that the Chinese
government is still trying to manage its transition to a free economy.
Ultimately, that will happen. However, the difference between the former
communist regions such as Europe, Russia, and China, in comparison to
Western Europe, such as North America, Australia, New Zealand, and
Japan, is significant whereas the former region has people who do not
depend on government and the latter still expects government to be there
to take care of us until we die. A collapse in government in the former
communist regions will not be as devastating to the common people and
it would be in the Western developed world. China and Russia learned
that Marxism failed. It is simply our turn in the West to experience the
same as they did with the collapse of socialism.
After 2032, the financial capital of the world will simply migrate to
China. It always migrates. You are assuming that the government of
China will survive in its current form. They too will change and alter.
In the West, governments are not interested in reform. They are only
interested in holding on to power. This is simply how empires, nations,
and city-states have always historically failed.
China is moving through its reform stage that began in 1989.95. We
should see the first political shake up by 2021/2022. That is simply how
long it will take from the beginning in 1989.95. They are simply at a
different point in their own cyclical history.
沒有留言:
張貼留言