www.armstrongeconomics.com
QUESTION:
What do you make of Trump’s proposal to restrict US investment in
China? Will this send the US economy into recession as everyone is
saying?
DH
ANSWER:
I
have never seen the press so anti-president in the history of this
nation. Every possible thing they claim will destroy the US economy. The
US trade with China will by no means send the US economy into a deep recession. However, blocking US investment into China would send the Chinese economy down even harder.
This style of analysis always reduces the future trend to one simple
event. The markets and the world economy are far more complex than a
single event. This is the entire problem with Western Analysis – it is
always linear and never cyclical. This is the same problem as Global
Warming. They see a 1-degree rise, project that out for 50 years, and
then assume the trend will remain the same – linear analysis. They
always project the future in this manner and NEVER look at the trends in history to learn what are the “real” possibilities from similar events.
What you must understand is they often call this type of struggle
between the current superpower (Financial Capital of the World) and the
rising power to take that title, the Thucydides Trap.
This is named after the ancient Greek historian Thucydides who wrote
about a war that devastated the two leading city-states of classical
Greece – Sparta & Athens.
Thucydides explained: “It was the rise of Athens and the fear that this instilled in Sparta that made war inevitable.”
While Thucydides provided his opinion, there was another backdrop to
this war which he did not cover. Looking at this from an economic issue,
it was the ancient clash between Capitalism and Communism. Sparta never
issued coins whereas the Athenian Owl coins became the international
currency recognized even in barbarian regions.
Sparta was an ancient communist-style state. Athens, on the other
hand, was the Financial Capital of the Ancient world. They developed
banking, insurance, and commodity markets. Sparta saw Athens as a
decadent threat so it was one of power and fundamental disagreement with
the economic differences between the two city-states. But Sparta had
the backing of other city-states which were forced to pay tribute
(taxes) to Athens.
The Thucydides Trap is considered the violent aspect
of the shift in the Financial Capital of the World. In most cases, the
rivalry between the major power and the new contender has led to war.
Only a few times the passing of the crown of the Financial Capital of
the World changed hands without war such as the loss of that title from
Britain to the United States. However, there was still war involved
whereas Britain lost its economic status due to war in Europe primarily
and then the rise of the Labour Party. It did not involve war with the
United States.
Nonetheless, we are looking at the risk of a conflict between China
and the United States as this struggle for power continues. The USA will
lose the title to China. Out computer model will be correct on that.
But it does not necessarily mean war will unfold. The West will fall
because of the economic conflicts internally between the left and right
as socialism is dying and all the promises cannot be funded. So we see
this more as the case with Britain that it lost the title to the United
States without a direct war between the two powers.
只係商業利益問題, 提升到政府層面, 咪又係一個"錢"字!
回覆刪除