按照 Martin Amstrong 的預測, 2032年是歐美金融大洗牌的時候, 所以美國做乜野都好, 佢地只可以頂到2032年, 所以大家一定要為自己財富好好計劃, 唔好到時同歐美財富一齊消失............
www.silverdoctors.com
Dave Kranzler says without the Fed’s
intervention, financial meltdown will be ten times worse than in 2008,
but that’s coming eventually anyway…
by Dave Kranzler of Investment Research Dynamics
Gresham’s Law in action: The diminishing availability of physical gold from the market (per several different accounts in London) corresponds to the proliferation of fiat currency printing and paper gold derivatives.
Since September the Fed has increased the size of its balance sheet by $414 billion or 11% in less than four months. It’s the fastest rate at which the Fed has printed money in its history. The Fed insists that this “repo” program is not the reinstatement of “Quantitative Easing.” In one sense the Fed is correct. This money printing program is a direct bailout of the big banks. And now the Fed is proposing to start bailing out hedge funds:
Federal Reserve officials are considering lending cash directly to hedge funds through clearinghouses to ease stress in the repo market. But that could be a tough sell for policy makers (WSJ).
Yes, liquidity in the inte-rbank overnight collateralized lending system dried up in September. But it’s not because of a shortage of cash to lend. The reason is two-fold. First, banks needed cash/Tier 1 collateral to shore up their own reserves. Why? Because bank assets – especially subprime loans – are starting to melt-down – i.e. rising delinquencies and defaults. This is provable just by looking at the footnotes in quarterly bank 10-Q’s. Second, hedge fund assets – primarily the bottom half of CLO’s, credit default swaps, leveraged loans – are melting down.
The banks know this because these are the same deteriorating assets held by banks. In order to induce overnight repo lending, it would require a repo rate many multiples of the artificially low repo rate in order to reflect the risk of holding compromised collateral overnight. This is why the repo rate spiked up briefly to 10% in September. That rate reflected the overnight interest rate desperate borrowers were willing to pay for an overnight collateralized loan. Banks pulled away from lending in the repo market because they no longer trusted the collateral – even on an overnight basis. This is why the Fed was “forced” to start printing $10’s of billions and make it available to the repo market.
The Fed created the problem in the first place by holding interest rates artificially low and leaving several trillion of its first series of QE operations in the banking system. This in turn fostered a catastrophic level of morally hazardous investing by banks and hedge funds. Now the Fed will try to monetize this – it has already hinted that the “repo” bailout will be extended now to April. Absence this Fed intervention, 2008 x 10 will ensue – which will happen eventually anyway.
Ultimately, it will be a tragedy if the Fed bails out the the banks and the hedge funds – especially the hedge funds. Who benefits from this? Bank and hedge fund operators should be penalized for making reckless investment decisions – not bailed out by what will end up to be taxpayer money. We already saw in 2008 that banks take the bailout funds and continued to pay themselves huge bonuses despite making lending decisions for which they should be penalized.
And a bailout of the hedge funds would reward hedge fund managers for investments that would never have been made had the Fed let a free market determine the true cost of making those investments.
I said back in 2003 that the Fed would print money and monetize debt until the elitists had swept every last crumb of middle class wealth off the table and into their own pockets before letting the system collapse. The bank bailout in 2008 and now the bank/hedge fund bailout is an example of this wealth transfer process. The only question that remains in my mind is whether or not the current bailout operation will be the last “sweep.”
by Dave Kranzler of Investment Research Dynamics
Gresham’s Law in action: The diminishing availability of physical gold from the market (per several different accounts in London) corresponds to the proliferation of fiat currency printing and paper gold derivatives.
Since September the Fed has increased the size of its balance sheet by $414 billion or 11% in less than four months. It’s the fastest rate at which the Fed has printed money in its history. The Fed insists that this “repo” program is not the reinstatement of “Quantitative Easing.” In one sense the Fed is correct. This money printing program is a direct bailout of the big banks. And now the Fed is proposing to start bailing out hedge funds:
Federal Reserve officials are considering lending cash directly to hedge funds through clearinghouses to ease stress in the repo market. But that could be a tough sell for policy makers (WSJ).
Yes, liquidity in the inte-rbank overnight collateralized lending system dried up in September. But it’s not because of a shortage of cash to lend. The reason is two-fold. First, banks needed cash/Tier 1 collateral to shore up their own reserves. Why? Because bank assets – especially subprime loans – are starting to melt-down – i.e. rising delinquencies and defaults. This is provable just by looking at the footnotes in quarterly bank 10-Q’s. Second, hedge fund assets – primarily the bottom half of CLO’s, credit default swaps, leveraged loans – are melting down.
The banks know this because these are the same deteriorating assets held by banks. In order to induce overnight repo lending, it would require a repo rate many multiples of the artificially low repo rate in order to reflect the risk of holding compromised collateral overnight. This is why the repo rate spiked up briefly to 10% in September. That rate reflected the overnight interest rate desperate borrowers were willing to pay for an overnight collateralized loan. Banks pulled away from lending in the repo market because they no longer trusted the collateral – even on an overnight basis. This is why the Fed was “forced” to start printing $10’s of billions and make it available to the repo market.
The Fed created the problem in the first place by holding interest rates artificially low and leaving several trillion of its first series of QE operations in the banking system. This in turn fostered a catastrophic level of morally hazardous investing by banks and hedge funds. Now the Fed will try to monetize this – it has already hinted that the “repo” bailout will be extended now to April. Absence this Fed intervention, 2008 x 10 will ensue – which will happen eventually anyway.
Ultimately, it will be a tragedy if the Fed bails out the the banks and the hedge funds – especially the hedge funds. Who benefits from this? Bank and hedge fund operators should be penalized for making reckless investment decisions – not bailed out by what will end up to be taxpayer money. We already saw in 2008 that banks take the bailout funds and continued to pay themselves huge bonuses despite making lending decisions for which they should be penalized.
And a bailout of the hedge funds would reward hedge fund managers for investments that would never have been made had the Fed let a free market determine the true cost of making those investments.
I said back in 2003 that the Fed would print money and monetize debt until the elitists had swept every last crumb of middle class wealth off the table and into their own pockets before letting the system collapse. The bank bailout in 2008 and now the bank/hedge fund bailout is an example of this wealth transfer process. The only question that remains in my mind is whether or not the current bailout operation will be the last “sweep.”
我地系亚洲国家要注意什么才不会跟他们一起沉船？Lisa姐可否指点一下。
回覆刪除Martin Amstrong 都一早說了, 第一是實物: 實金實銀和一些地區的物業...., 第二自己生意或已提出的穩定的公司股票實物......
回覆刪除最危是放在銀行或一些機構的資產.......呢D公司倒閉, 你乜都無啦....
如果金融大洗牌，股票理应都会好危险。
回覆刪除何谓稳定的公司股票？
香港電力、共用個D哇.....我都唔買股票了, 錢都放中港物業, 而將來都作重大陸.....
回覆刪除多谢Lisa姐的意见。
回覆刪除