kingworldnews.com
Today
a legend who is connected in China at the highest levels warned the big
risk for America is that China dumps its US dollar holdings. He also
said investors should buy gold.
A Deal With The Chinese
By John Ing, Maison Placements
May 1 (King World News) – Tariffs
have upset world markets and decades of America-made supply chains
helping cause in December the worst single month market sell-off since
the Great Depression. Because Mr. Trump views the stock market as the
one signifier of the US economy and a simplistic proxy for measuring the
success of his policies, this deal-making president regularly sidelined
his negotiating team, believing that he could do better.
Now,
“Tariff Man” Trump wants a deal with the Chinese because pressure for a
deal has escalated daily with both sides ready to settle for a truce.
His politically important farming base pushed the president to work out
an agreement since the tit for tat countermeasures hurt growth at a time
when Donald Trump most needs a trade pact. Total US exports of soybeans
fell 28 percent in March compared to a year ago. Although signing USMCA
over a year ago, his tariffs on US steel and aluminum remain, hurting
US businesses and consumers alike. Moreover, Congress has yet to ratify
the trade pact with the Canadian and Mexican legislatures threatening to
balk at ratifying the agreement. These deals reflect not how easy is
Trump’s new order, but how difficult. Trade deals aren’t that easy to
win, it seems.
In
fact, the president’s obsession on balanced trade between China and the
US was doomed to fail because of America’s huge service sector surplus
with China. Yet it’s Germany, not China that has the world’s largest
external account surplus. And still, not content with a “victorious”
truce, the president is to focus next on Europe, threatening to impose
steel tariffs on foreign cars. Europe countered with $11 billion of
tariffs … and the beat goes on.
Symbiotic Relationship
To
be sure the recent US – China tensions have escalated beyond trade and
some believe that the war is really over technological supremacy. Our
view is that while there is the appearance of two trading superpowers
vying for advantage, the US is most reliant on China whilst China is
reliant on the US. This quid-pro-quo arrangement stems from China’s need
for American markets for its goods and in turn, the US need for outside
funding…
Unlike
Japan or China which finance their deficits internally, the US is
dependent on foreign offshore funds for up to a third of their deficits.
On the other hand, China’s generated surpluses are recycled in US
treasuries and lately, gold. China today has $3.1 trillion of foreign
exchange reserves, the largest in the world and has been diversifying
its reliance on the dollar, seeking to internationalize the renminbi as a
reserve currency. Currently five percent of foreign global reserves are
in renminbi, in contrast to almost 60 percent in dollars. Thus over the
short term, despite attempts to internationalize the renminbi, both
countries need each other in a symbiotic relationship.
America’s Growing Isolation
Of
concern is that in designing a new world order, America’s diplomatic
isolation creates vacuums that their rivals fill. For example, Trump’s
call for regime change in Venezuela was rejected by Russia who
subsequently sent troops to protect the oil rich socialist nation and
soon after, China sent soldiers on a “humanitarian mission” to one of
Venezuela’s military bases. And in an effort to put pressure on Cuba for
their support of Venezuela, the US opened a can of worms by
reactivating the Helms-Burton Act which was waived by every president
over the past 25 years. The international community had vehemently
opposed the move because the act exposes European and Canadian
businesses to American lawsuits.
And,
in yet another move that escalated tensions with China, Trump’s
unilateral decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal not only
isolated Washington, but the ending of the sanction waivers to any
country importing Iranian crude, pits the US against allies, India,
Turkey, Japan and South Korea. The policy move further undercuts
America’s relationships, deepening Washington’s sense of isolation and
in focusing on Iran and Venezuela, caused a spike in oil prices,
lighting a fuse to the geopolitical sensitive Middle East. Only a month
ago, Trump tweeted, “the world cannot afford an oil price hike-fragile”…
as is his policy.
America
also criticized Italy for joining China’s Belt and Road Plan (BRI).
Beijing’s global Belt Road Initiative aims to finance and build roads,
ports and railways linking more than 80 countries including Eurasia, the
Middle East and Africa. Italy is to be the first G7 country joining six
EU countries to endorse the BRI despite pressure from Washington.
America has weaponized this participation as a “them versus us” argument
as part of the China vs US conflict.
But
that may not matter, the US is playing catch up, particularly in
technology where China has more internet users, generates more data and
is at the forefront in 5G. Their tech sector is already ahead in
batteries and chips and artificial intelligence is next. Similarly, in
less than a decade, China’s carmakers today make more cars than the US,
with some 325 million cars on its roads…
America’s Fiscal Indiscipline is its Achilles Heel
No
doubt once the two superpowers wrap up their trade truce, global
markets will rally. However, looking ahead, a trade deal is not the
panacea for the market. We believe that this presents a “sell on news”
opportunity as the market must then cope with a stagflation US economy,
overvalued valuations plus the long term impact of trade wars, a Brexit
and a subsequent legacy of debt, deficits and doom.
The
deeper point, is that the US trade deficit last year hit a 10-year high
of $621 billion and despite the imposition of Trump’s tariffs, the
deficit rose 12.5 percent last year with a 6.3 percent expansion in US
exports, but a whopping 7.5 percent boost in imports. With the trade
numbers improving lately to eight month lows, the US economy Q1 GDP at
3.2 percent beat expectations. However drilling down this was due more
to a boost in inventories which offset an ominous drop in household
spending. In fact, recent studies show that the cost of his tariff war
has been borne by American consumers who have paid more in higher
prices, than the revenues that the tariffs were supposed to generate.
While,
America’s debt and deficits must be financed for years to come,
inflation has been a no show despite corporate debt soaring to record
highs, exceeding pre-crisis levels. Faced with chronic low interest
rates, junk bonds too have reached the same size of subprime mortgage
debt which exacerbated the financial crisis of 2007. Low bond yields
have already done severe damage to global pension systems, altering the
risk profile of assets making leveraged bets potential time bombs. Bond
sales boomed as the Fed’s pivot prompted a fresh binge in borrowing.
This boom has not yet gone bust.
Abandoning Monetary Orthodoxy
While
lawmakers talk about the need to tackle trade, the elephant in the room
is spending and the resulting deficits. Both Democrats and Republicans,
it seems have given up on curbing deficits. They are reluctant to cut
spending in spite of the longest government shutdown in history. Instead
they have come up with new and improved money printing ways to pay for
their bills. The Democrats are pushing a new-old theorem, Modern
Monetary Theory (MMT) aka unlimited money printing, to finance new
spending programs such as the Green New Deal or Medicare for all. The
Democrats’ belief is rooted in a half century old phenomenon that
government can always borrow in their own currency because they could
easily create more money. That spending falls in the same category as
that other unconventional tool, “quantitative easing” (QE) whose roots
stem from former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s description of “helicopter
money”, which left a legacy of debt, deficit and doom. Both QE and
helicopter money involves the printing of money to expand money supply,
however by contrast, helicopter money shoveled money into the system,
without increasing the Fed’s balance sheet.
Economic
orthodoxy wisdom suggests that large doses of government debt will
eventually lead to higher inflation and interest rates.
The
Republicans and Donald Trump have pushed for an easier monetary policy
calling for trillion dollar deficits and yet another dose of bond buying
stimulus. Ironically, the Republicans’ instincts are rooted in the
early seventies, when once dormant inflation returned from the dead
resurrected by a potent mixture of low interest rates, the Vietnam War
and the pumping of liquidity into the economy. Today we again have
record low interest rates, the pumping of trillions, not billions of
liquidity into the financial system and moribund inflation. However,
while Main Street has yet to experience higher core inflation, Wall
Street has seen an unprecedented virulent asset inflation, fueled by a
series of record highs, unicorn IPOs, billion dollar buybacks and record
leverage. The Republicans are set to even outspend the Democrats. The
swamp of Washington still needs to be drained. In abandoning monetary
orthodoxy, the seeds of inflation have been sown and that should be of
concern to investors.
And
worse, as part of today’s voodoo economics, Mr. Trump “has doubled
down”, pushing the Fed to pursue “Quantitative Easing IV”, calling for
even lower rates despite the Fed’s unexpected U-turn in monetary policy
to keep rates low. And after shaking up Homeland Security in a crackdown
on immigration, he set his sights on shaking up the independent Fed by
filling two vacancies on the Fed’s powerful board, with political
allies. For the last half century, central banks were the last line of
fiscal defense, curbing economic booms and busts. Ironically the
president’s blatant attempt to pressure the Fed is not dissimilar to
other countries where the central banks of India, Venezuela, Turkey and
Argentina have also been pressured to loosen monetary policies.
It Has Happened Before
Once
before, facing re-election, President Nixon pressured Fed Chairman
Arthur Burns to slash rates which boosted Nixon’s re-election chances in
1972. Back then, runaway double digit inflation ensued, and the
consequence was near hyperinflation and a crash. Nixon resigned, but
left to clean up the mess was Fed Chair Paul Volcker who slapped on
double digit interest rates to stamp out inflation. A deep recession, of
course followed. While attempts to influence central bankers is nothing
new, history shows that once the credibility and independence is lost,
the inflationary consequences becomes evident, first in risk assets and
then spreads…
At
center stage is the US dollar. For over half a century the US
government has enjoyed the “preeminent privilege” of being allowed to
print and borrow in their own currency, thanks to its role as the
primary world’s reserve currency. America could not default because they
could always print new money to pay their creditors. That privilege,
once enjoyed by Great Britain was lost in the Forties, when Britain’s
debts exceeded their ability to pay. The United States, like Britain
before has taken that privilege for granted.
We
believe America’s fiscal irresponsibility jeopardizes that status.
President Trump has called a halt to the unwinding and normalization of
the Fed’s balance sheet which is choking already from the legacy of
monetizing three rounds of bond buying. He also threatened to replace
his handpicked Fed Chairman, Jerome Powell, drawing a critical fault
line through the Fed’s independence. The consequences for the dollar are
far reaching. In shaking up the Fed and pushing for a looser policy,
Trump and his team’s ignorance of the inexorable rise in debt
compromises the very foundation of the world’s reserve currency. Déjà
vu?
Against
this backdrop, America’s public debt has now ratcheted up to a record
$22 trillion, boosted by the unfunded tax cut which increased 18 percent
in spending, violating the spending cap. The Fed’s balance sheet at $4
trillion is weighed down with excessive exposure to government debt
which is a potential systemic problem, in contrast to only $1 trillion
in 2008. That other large structural deficit continues to grow as Trump
unleashed a $4.75 trillion budget which won’t get Congressional
approval. Trump’s spending plans call for a debt to GDP of 100 percent
plus this year and the interest payments alone to service that debt,
exceeds $500 billion or more than the US spends on defense spending. And
despite the decline of America’s credit rating in 2011, and a decade
after the financial crisis, US public debt remains at double A
(S&P). And now, Mr. Trump and his administration is set to push the
US into the deepest deficits on record.
America’s Financial Hegemony Is Not Sustainable
To
be sure after a decade of record stock market gains and IPO unicorns,
the world’s central banks should be threatening to pull the punch bowl
away. However the December market collapse was the worst on record as
the stock market vigilantes took matters into their own hands, causing
the Fed and other central banks to execute a U-turn, putting interest
rates on hold which drove markets again to new record levels. However,
if December was anything, it was a wake-up call. For too long the United
States have mismanaged its finances, consuming more than they are
producing. We also believe that America’s established control over
global finance and weaponization of sanctions threatens America’s
central role in world’s financial markets.
With
more than $10 trillion of bonds showing negative yields, fears of
deflation are growing. Like the Thirties, investors are paying also for
the privilege to park their money and if held to redemption, would lose
money. Noteworthy was during the Dirty Thirties, gold was a hedge
against deflation, acting as a store of value, whilst asset prices
plummeted in a deflationary spiral.
We
believe that the Trump-inspired trade wars, an unpredictable presidency
together with the weaponization of American financial hegemony has in
large part forced investors to look for alternatives. The dollar’s
global role gives America the means to impose financial sanctions to
great effect. It can exclude countries from the dollar based
international payments system. Trump’s populist approach whilst thumbing
his nose at foreign investors has resulted in a weakening view of the
US dollar. Although there are few alternatives, America’s financial
hegemony is simply not sustainable. Gold is a hedge against that.
The
US is not dissimilar to an emerging market economy where their balance
of payments is as terrible as their fiscal debt. Today, the greenback
has run into resistance on fears of a protracted trade war and an
inverted yield curve. Geopolitics is playing a greater part here. As the
global repercussion spreads, America depends on the very countries that
it labels a security risk to finance their consumption – how naïve and
dangerous.
On
that point, our view is that the Fed has reached the limits of its
abilities with a balance sheet which represents more than 25 percent of
US GDP. With one third of America’s debt financed by outsiders, an
inverted yield curve has encouraged investors to look elsewhere. We
believe that the US financial hegemony and deteriorating financial
status has jeopardized the dollar’s reserve status and we are near that
point of inflection where like Great Britain before, creditors will balk
at financing US obligations…
Gold Has Become Money Again
Fittingly,
gold is an alternative to the dollar. In the past, it has been a
protector or hedge against the debasement of currency, because it is
less susceptible to government manipulation. Last year, central banks
purchased a near record 23 million ounces, becoming the world’s largest
buyer, adding to their reserves at the highest pace in 50 years. Central
banks keep dollars in reserve but under the new Basel III standard,
gold has taken on more importance and can be today valued the same as
dollars. Basel III returns gold as a meaningful reserve asset whereby,
gold is now risk weighted as a Tier I asset as part of total reserves.
Thus, gold reserves held on central banks’ balance sheet can be valued
at 100 percent allowing them to increase their liquidity and revalue
their balance sheets upward. Gold has become money again.
In
total, governments added 652 tonnes in 2018, the second highest total
on record, according to the World Gold Council. They see gold as an
alternative to the dollar. China has been on a gold buying spree,
recently purchasing gold again for the past four months, laying a
foundation of gold in their $3.1 trillion reserve stockpile. China is
the world’s largest consumer of gold and must import gold to satisfy
domestic demands. China is also the world’s largest creditor and their
gold holdings make them less dependent on the dollar, particularly since
the United States has weaponized the dollar. Other countries are
diversifying with Saudi Arabia considering dropping the petrodollar and
even threatening to dump their stockpile of treasuries should Congress
lift sovereign immunity from US antitrust laws (NOPEC). Russia has
already replaced the dollar with gold, dumping all their US debt,
purchasing one third of the world’s gold supplies last year. They have
tripled their reserves over the past decade as a counter to the US
dollar dominance and hold 2,163 tonnes of gold.
Russia
and China have become the fifth and sixth largest gold holders in the
world, rivaling America which has the largest stockpile at 8,000 tonnes.
The risk for America is that China also dumps its dollar holdings which
would create problems for the US government’s financing plans, and the
dollar itself. Remember the Golden Rule: “Whoever has the gold makes the
rules.”
We
believe that investors remain too complacent, unwilling and unable to
fathom the magnitude of the problem. The unsustainable is no longer
sustainable. We also believe that when “informed insiders” such as the
world’s central banks buy gold at the highest pace in fifty years and
the gold miners buy each other, that gold must be a screaming buy.
Compared with stocks and other financial assets, gold is inexpensive.
Gold is like Marie Kondo, the neat freak. However, unlike the
decluttering guru, gold’s real joy is its traditional store of value. It
is a good thing to have.
沒有留言:
張貼留言