kingworldnews.com
On
the heels of a wild week of trading in Bitcoin, what is happening in
gold and the mining shares is going largely unnoticed but it is an
all-time record and truly stunning.
From Jason Goepfert at SentimenTrader: Money
keeps leaving the gold miners. Structural trouble in gold mining ETFs
got a lot of media attention a couple of weeks ago, and investors have
taken notice. The main gold mining ETFs have lost $5 billion in assets
in less than 30 days, averaging a loss of nearing 1% of their assets
every day. That’s the worst outflow in their history, but it has been an inconsistent suggestion that there is excessive pessimism…
Gold Funds Keep Bleeding Assets
A little over a month ago, the largest ETFs that focus on gold mining companies had over $21 billion in assets under management.
It has been trickling steadily lower and recently turned into a flood. The largest fund, GDX, alone lost over $660 million in assets on Wednesday.
Altogether, the six largest funds are now worth less than $16 billion, a
stunning loss even as the price of the funds mainly tread water.
This
leak in assets is most likely due to reasons other than pure pessimism.
Some of the funds have pressed up against their practical maximum and
have ended up investing in other gold funds instead of gold mining
stocks, a ridiculous situation that was bound to burst.
The chart below shows the average inflow/outflow among the funds over the past month, expressed as a percentage of assets.
An All-Time Record
We can see that the funds have lost nearly 1% of their assets on average
every day for the past month, far beyond anything they’ve suffered in
recent (or all-time) history.
ETF
fund flows aren’t necessarily an accurate reflection of sentiment,
since some of the flow is due to shorting activity, etc. And we can see
that other bouts of large, persistent outflows were an inconsistent
indicator for funds like GDX.
It’s
tempting to think that the huge outflows have to be a sign of pessimism
and thus a bullish indicator for funds like GDX. But there are likely
reasons other than sentiment behind the moves, and even if not, the
flow’s use as an indicator, contrary or otherwise, was too inconsistent.
We’re not reading much into it.
沒有留言:
張貼留言