www.armstrongeconomics.com
QUESTION:
Mr. Armstrong; Do you believe in portfolio diversification?
ANSWER:
No not really. I see no point in putting money in something you know
will be a loss. Diversification within a sector is one thing. But buying
government bonds when rates are at a 5,000 year low and governments are
in trouble around the world, I just see as really stupid.
Once you understand how our global model works, you can see the trend
unfolding in a numerous instruments that therefore confirms the trading
direction. For example, we warned that gold had made an important high
and would crash from 2011 for at least 3 years minimum. At the same
time, we warned that the Dow would breakout to new highs. Barrons
reported that forecast and did not believe that we would be correct.
Both the high in gold and the breakout in the Dow were connected. Each
confirmed the other among a host of other relationships.
What is impossible is trying to forecast just gold or the Dow in
isolation relying upon fundamentals, which always prove to be worthless.
Take the Long-Term Capital Management Crisis of 1998. The problem began
in Russia and investments there collapsed but you could not get out at
any price. They began selling assets everywhere else in the USA to
Japan. This became a liquidity crisis that spread into a contagion. You
could look at all of the fundamentals that said nothing should be
happening in Japan. That led to massive losses in Japan that were
contrary to fundamental analysis.
Everything is interconnected. Diversification is for people who
cannot forecast so they just hope to stay ahead of the game. Asset
Allocation has to be done smartly. You need some cash and those who will
want some bonds v equities simply need to stay short-term and away from
issues that will be a problem.
沒有留言:
張貼留言